Early Modern Warfare 4 campaign reactions are broadly positive, but the picture is still incomplete as Steam praise, critic caveats, and Switch 2 performance impressions pull the conversation in different directions.
Image: IGDB
Store links: Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 4 on Steam
Campaign praise landed before the full game did
The strongest early signal around Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 4 is that its campaign has started far better than many players expected, but the timing matters. PCGamesN reported that Modern Warfare 4 Steam reviews were 90% positive from the first 2,000 user ratings during advance access, and noted that those reviews were for the story campaign only because multiplayer had not launched yet.
That creates the central tension in the first wave of Modern Warfare 4 reviews. The Call of Duty Modern Warfare 4 campaign is being judged in isolation, while the full package, including multiplayer and DMZ, is still waiting for broader review coverage. Nintendo Life also warned readers that many reviews are still in progress and that final scores for the entire package will come after the rest of the game goes live.
For a series where the multiplayer usually dominates the long tail, this is an unusual early spotlight. The campaign is doing the heavy lifting for the first impression, and for now the reaction is much warmer than the last few single-player Call of Duty conversations suggested it might be.
Critics are praising the pacing, but the praise has guardrails
The early critic read is positive, with enough caveats to keep it from becoming a clean victory lap. IGN’s campaign review in progress scored it 8/10 and said Modern Warfare 4 made the reviewer “feel something for the series again,” citing a strong run of missions, new bonds between characters, and a behind-enemy-lines mission borrowing ideas from DMZ as a highlight. IGN also framed the campaign as the best Modern Warfare has been since the 2019 reboot by a clear distance.
GameSpot, quoted by Pure Xbox and Nintendo Life, gave the campaign 7/10 and called it an edge-of-the-seat thrill ride that feels like it had more time to think through its experience. According to that review, the pacing holds despite interwoven storylines and alternating points of view, with enough mission variety to keep the story moving.
The criticism is important because it points to the ceiling. GamesRadar’s early verdict, quoted by Nintendo Life and Pure Xbox, described Modern Warfare 4 as a confident cinematic shooter with strong performances and moral complexity, but also said rigid mission design and frustrating restrictions can threaten the fun. Kotaku’s roundup cited PC Gamer’s view that the campaign has extravagant set pieces, lavish cinematics, and strong gunplay, while also noting PC Gamer found the story rushed and unsatisfying in places, especially around Mads Mikkelsen’s role.
From a shooter perspective, that reads like a campaign winning on tempo, spectacle, and trigger feel, while still carrying some of the old Call of Duty campaign friction: heavy scripting, strict boundaries, and story compression when the game tries to close a long-running arc.
Steam reaction is loud, but it is still campaign-only evidence
The Modern Warfare 4 Steam reviews discussion is currently being led by praise rather than a documented backlash. PCGamesN reported that the first Steam user reviews were 90% positive and said many comments shared some version of “I didn’t feel bored at all.” The outlet quoted one user saying, “You actually deserved that ending, Infinity Ward,” and another saying they expected to refund the game but got pulled into the campaign and finished it in a day.
PCGamesN also reported that cast members responded to the early praise on social media. Barry Sloane, the voice of Captain John Price, thanked players for their kind words and asked them to avoid spoilers. Maria Elisa Camargo, the voice of Valeria Garza, said she was overwhelmed by the response, while Samuel Roukin, who plays Simon “Ghost” Riley, thanked the community and also asked players to keep spoilers out of comments.
The supported Steam story, then, is not that complaints are dominating. The available reporting does not substantiate a major Steam complaint wave at this stage. The real limitation is scope. PCGamesN explicitly noted that the current Steam reviews are coming in before multiplayer enters the conversation, which means they cannot be treated as a verdict on netcode, weapon balance, launch maps, progression, or DMZ. Those are the pressure points that usually decide whether a Call of Duty keeps its audience after the campaign credits roll.
So the cautious read is simple: Steam players who have spoken early appear unusually happy with the campaign, but those Modern Warfare 4 Steam reviews are not yet a complete product verdict.
The split comes from expectations, not only from scores
The reason the early response feels divided is that Modern Warfare 4 is being compared against several different failures and expectations at once. IGN described 2023’s Modern Warfare 3 campaign as a low point built from multiplayer maps and thin story fragments. PCGamesN referenced its own earlier coverage, saying 2022’s Modern Warfare 2 had dull characters and 2023’s Modern Warfare 3 was considered disposable and boring by its reviewer. Kotaku contrasted MW4’s early reception with last year’s Black Ops 7 campaign, which it said left many critics perplexed and disappointed.
Against that backdrop, a conventional six-to-eight-hour campaign can look like a rebound. Windows Central, quoted by Nintendo Life, said Modern Warfare 4 has 16 story missions that take roughly six to eight hours depending on skill level and secret hunting, with a mostly linear structure and big cinematic set pieces. Kotaku similarly described the campaign as a six-hour, 16-mission experience that returns to what the franchise’s campaigns are expected to do well.
There is also a hype layer that should be kept separate from review evidence. HappyGamer reported that an early post called the campaign “absolutely unhinged” and “brutally fkn savage,” while telling readers to “forget GTA VI.” HappyGamer also stressed that the post did not describe mission names, clips, a score, or how much of the campaign was played. That is a reaction, not a review.
Polygon reported positive fan reaction on the Modern Warfare 4 subreddit, including one user calling it the best campaign since the original trilogy and another comparing its storytelling favorably to original MW2. Those are useful signs of player mood, but they sit beside the critic caveats about rigid mission design and rushed story beats. The early consensus is positive. The split is in how far people are willing to take that positivity before the full game is tested.
Switch 2 performance is becoming a separate talking point
Modern Warfare 4 Switch 2 performance has become its own story because the platform changes the frame of the campaign discussion. My Nintendo News reported that IGN played the Switch 2 version and came away “pleasantly surprised” by its performance, while making clear that the version has obvious downgrades compared with PlayStation 5 and Xbox Series X|S.
The quoted IGN impression is specific: textures are “nowhere near as detailed,” flat surfaces and faces look smoothed over, and the game is “by no means a looker.” The same passage also says gameplay was smooth, running at 30fps at 4K while docked, with the campaign locked at 30fps and multiplayer targeting 60fps. IGN’s quoted impression also said the campaign framerate remained consistent during explosive moments.
That tradeoff is exactly why Switch 2 impressions are splitting off from the main review conversation. On PS5, Xbox Series X|S, and PC, a 30fps campaign cap would be judged differently. On Nintendo’s new hardware, the question becomes whether Call of Duty still feels responsive enough with reduced visual fidelity. My Nintendo News quoted IGN saying it “feels every bit as snappy as the series usually is,” which is the key performance claim for shooter players.
Nintendo Life’s own Switch 2 impressions, quoted in its review roundup and by Pure Xbox, said the campaign does its best with a “popcorn game” approach and that Nintendo players do not need to catch up on the previous entries because the recap is brief. For a Nintendo audience that has not had the same recent Call of Duty cadence as Xbox, PlayStation, and PC players, accessibility and stable performance may matter as much as visual cuts.
Who should play now, and who should wait
If you mainly care about the Call of Duty Modern Warfare 4 campaign, the early evidence is unusually encouraging. IGN, GameSpot, GamesRadar, PC Gamer via Kotaku, Nintendo Life, PCGamesN, Polygon, and Pure Xbox all point to a campaign that is being received as a rebound for Modern Warfare, even when they disagree on how high it ranks. The common strengths are pacing, set pieces, performances, and a sense that the campaign was built as a dedicated single-player experience rather than an afterthought.
If you buy Call of Duty for multiplayer, the safer move is to wait for the full review cycle. The sources repeatedly separate campaign impressions from final reviews because multiplayer and DMZ are not fully represented in the early verdicts. None of the provided sources settle the questions that matter most for competitive players: launch map quality, spawn logic, weapon tuning, input feel across platforms, server stability, or long-term progression.
Switch 2 players have a different decision. The reported campaign tradeoff is clear: lower visual detail and a 30fps campaign lock, but early IGN impressions, as reported by My Nintendo News, say the framerate is consistent and the game still feels snappy. Anyone sensitive to 30fps in a shooter should wait for more platform-specific coverage, especially for multiplayer, which is said to target 60fps but has not yet been judged in the same way by the provided sources.
There is also a date wrinkle. HappyGamer reported campaign early access opened on October 16 and said full launch would be October 22. Nintendo Life and Kotaku both state that Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 4 launches on October 23. That may reflect regional timing or publication framing, but the sources do not resolve it. Players should check their local storefront before planning preload, time off, or a launch-night squad session.
The cleanest read from the first wave is that Modern Warfare 4 reviews are better than the recent campaign reputation suggested, while the final judgment still depends on the modes Call of Duty players grind after the story is over.